![]() Voice conferencing and remote support features are also available, but not video conferencing. Participants do not need to download or install plug-ins. The free version of Mikogo allows presenters to share their screen, document or application with one person live over the web. The basic plan supports screen sharing and audio other plans include videoconferencing features and support for up to 150 people for $18 per month. An entire screen or just an application window can be shared with up to four participants - the host can email links to participants. Screen sharing as a primary function Dead Simple Screen Sharingĭead Simple offers screen sharing via web browser, through the installation of a Chrome or Firefox extension no signup is required. Any organization that needs to share private company data should look to enterprise-level products. Note that many free tools are not suitable for sensitive communications. Here is an array of apps and services that offer free screen-sharing capabilities, organized by the main focus of the tool (remote access, web conferencing, or screen sharing alone). Time limits on meetings, the number of participants allowed, and other restrictions on free versions have been lifted by some companies, at least temporarily. For my wife, it's a deal-breaker but, for me, it's functionality I don't need.Īfter I'd started working with Parsec, /u/seehp suggested NoMachine which has an iOS client.Fortunately, several of these apps and services have expanded their free offerings due to the current Covid-19 situation. The *only* complaint I have is there's no version for iOS so I'm not able to connect from an iPad. While it says it's purely for game streaming, it actually works perfectly as a remote desktop solution and has performance comparable to Chrome Remote Desktop. While continuing to search around, I found Parsec. This machine is used for HTPC / TV gaming and the virtual graphics device has no 3D context. While that's a cool solution the performance of RDP itself actually causes problems for me (specifically, it creates a virtual graphics drivers that prevents some applications that I need from running. u/throwaway1111139991e suggested RDPWrap. While it worked generally well, I found it to be incredibly annoying "nagware" so I quickly uninstalled it. Per a suggestion, I checked out TeamViewer. I realize this subreddit might not be the right place for this question since I don't expect Firefox itself to offer a solution but, given the timing, I suspect there are others who may be making a similar move who either have the same question or have found a solution.Īdding some final thoughts here before marking as solved. Has anyone found a remote desktop solution that works as well as Chrome Remote Desktop? I have a HTPC that resides in a media closet and I manage it 100% remotely so I'm not interested in compromising on capability. I've tried several VNC implementations including TightVNC, UltraVNC, TurboVNC, and TightVNC and none of them offer anywhere near the performance of Chrome Remote Desktop. ![]() That said, the only key component in Chrome that I haven't found a suitable replacement for is Chrome Remote Desktop. With the recent proposed changes to Chrome, I was pushed over the edge and began migrating which has gone smoothly. I began thinking about switching back from Chrome. See this comment for a summary of where I ended up.īack in December, I downloaded Firefox to test something at work and, I'll admit, it was one of the first times I'd seen the browser in years (I was an extremely early adopter in the pre-0.1 "Phoenix" days but I haven't used it much in the past 5+ years) and I was extremely impressed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |